Jump to content

The Lady Soldier. I've Finished!

Recommended Posts

Well I picked the book up on Sunday afternoon... and finished it yesterday! (An indication that I enjoyed it :P) It isn't the sort of book I'd usually buy, I'm not entirely aure I've read a historical book before, which I'm well aware is quite strange! However as I was reading, it was just another story to me. I'm not sure that's really the right way to phrase it, but the point I'm trying to make is that it was written in such a way that it flowed nicely as I read it, and whilst I was aware that it was set in the past, that didn't make it any more difficult to read (which I must admit that I thoguht a historical book might be :o)


As for the story itself, I thoroughly enjoyed it! I felt almost as though I was there with the characters, experiencing what they did. I liked the way the POV switched between Jem and Tony, showing how they were feeling as their relationship progressed. The main part of the book in Spain felt just the right length to read, and I loeved the ending. The only part of the book that I had an issue with was the transition from Spain to the decision to leave London. I felt that this part was cut short in a way, as though there might have been more to tell, although I wouldn't know what that would be!

I was wondering if much of the original material was cut from the book, or if it was published more or less as it was first written? If there was much cut then where was it cut from and why?

Overall I really enjoyed this book, so many thanks to Kate and BGO for making it available to us! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Opal! I'm really glad you enjoyed The Lady Soldier. We didn't plan everything which happened which mean that the story took some unexpected turns which added to the suspense of writing it!


As for your question under the spoiler alert, I'm not sure how to reply using hidden text, but yes we had to cut some scenes from the book because of length, including some scenes from between where you refer which took place on the journey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For someone who never reads 'romance' novels, and was horribly put off by the cover, I actually enjoyed this book. Initially though, the syntax of some of the sentence structure was a little odd and I found that off putting, but I soon got swept up in the plot and enjoyed it as a romantic romp. I did find some phrases and events a little too stereotypical of romance novels, which is the reason I don't normally read them. Le Loup (?) was a satisfying baddie though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with most of the reviews posted so far. I finished the book in a few hours and found it an undemanding read for a sunny afternoon.


Given the subject, the cover could have been better - I thought Jem(ima) looked like a young Evonne Goolagong.


Many years ago I read quite a lot of historical fiction and enjoyed the genre. 'Lady Soldier' was probably too much of a romance for my taste. Jem and Tony verged on Mills and Boon at times. However the story was intriguing and the ending not too obvious.


Thanks to BGO for the reading opportunity.


If there is anyone who missed the offer and would like my copy, please send me a p.m. and I will send it on to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kate - one of your reviewers on Amazon said that this books had a "solid historical background" - did much research go into the historical detail for the time period?


I just ask because I wondered how accurate the detail was, as I didn't think it was overly detailed - but how much would be necessary for this type of novel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many years ago I read quite a lot of historical fiction and enjoyed the genre. 'Lady Soldier' was probably too much of a romance for my taste. Jem and Tony verged on Mills and Boon at times.


I agree with Silvergirl on this. I enjoyed the book but it didnt seem to me to contain a lot of historical detail, certainly not as much as I expected.


Having said that I read it quickly and the story flowed along nicely, a good summer read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historical detail / research:


I'm pleased the historical detail wasn't intrusive. I think fiction should be for entertainment, not instruction and not get in the way of the story.


In terms of the research, I'd already written two novels set in early 19th century England before I started on The Lady Soldier and so I was pretty confident that I already had the zeitgeist of the period at my fingertips. I have been collecting books from the period - especially of letters which I think are the closest we can really get now to having a flavour for how people spoke to one another, and words and phrases used.


We had to present Robert Hale, the publishers, with proof of our research into real life women who got away with being soldiers in historical times or they would not have been prepared to publish the book. I think most publishers of historical fiction take historical accuracy pretty seriously.


The research into the real 'lady soldiers' was necessary so that we could understand the physical and emotional issues Jem might face. We used this research in the story in terms of giving Jem feelings other women soldiers had described, as well as it helping us put together her character and a realistic plot about her adventures.


Thus it was only a case of researching the specific historical details required - in relation to Spain and the military - of which co-author Michelle Styles did a lot of the work on. I really enjoyed reading some of the first hand account of, for example for the scene in chapter one, the storming of Rodrigo. We were not able to go to Spain but I had an e-mail from someone who has been to Rodrigo saying how we had got the flavour right. A great thing about the Internet is that you can find all kinds of pictures and photos to help with this kind of thing. Then for the scenes in England - for example the Talbot inn in Ripley on the road from Portsmouth which is a real place - still there! - and in London - e.g. at the theatre I needed to check what was playing at the time and which theatres were open, what they were like inside etc


Mills and Boon:

Mills and Boon are probably the main publishers of historical romances in the UK but they would not have considered The Lady Soldier because the high proportion of other action and plot going on besides the romance. I think The Lady Soldier is 'historical romantic fiction' rather than 'historical romance' as such.


Co-author Michelle Styles has a contract with Mills and Boon and her first historical romance out with them will be out next May. Called The Gladiator's Honour. It's a first for Mills and Boon as it's set in ancient Rome and they've not published any ancient set historical romances. Ancient Rome is Michelle's historical period of choice and I don't think she is shy of saying how much she was influenced to write it by Russell Crowe in the film Gladiator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Le Loup:

Hazel, I'm pleased you enjoyed Le Loup. Michelle and I met when she was visiting London one weekend with her family and I remember, as we strolled up Piccadilly after visiting Wellington's old home (Apsley House), we had a great discussion all about poor Le Loup's miserable and disperate childhood and influences which shaped his character. We needed him to be a proper match for Jem and Tony to make it convincing, not a cardboard cut-out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historical detail / research:



Mills and Boon:

Mills and Boon are probably the main publishers of historical romances in the UK but they would not have considered The Lady Soldier because the high proportion of other action and plot going on besides the romance. I think The Lady Soldier is 'historical romantic fiction' rather than 'historical romance' as such.



I noticed that for a romance The Lady Soldier was very 'old-fashioned' for want of a better phrase when it came to the physical graphics of romance. Not having read any Mills and Boon, though I have a feeling they are a little more graphic (not in a Black Lace kind of way) - is that why they wouldn't have picked up Lady Soldier - as it had almost no instances of 'throbbing members' and 'milky thighs'? Was that a conscious decision of yours and Michelles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Le Loup:

We needed him to be a proper match for Jem and Tony to make it convincing, not a cardboard cut-out.


I actually thought he was the most real character, most natural. I felt he behaved like himself - whereas Jem adopted a few disguises/personas/personalities/fronts, a male notwthstanding, and her beau likewise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to say I enjoyed the book and read it over one afternoon in the garden. I would like to have found out a bit more about her earlier life though, what happened with her mother and stepfather in more detail, or perhaps that would be another book!


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am here at last. Many thanks to all concerned for setting this opportunity up.

Kate Allan told me about this group, but I have had other commitments. Not the least of which was finishing the proofs for The Gladiator's Honour, a Mills and Boon Historical set in 63 BCE.


I noticed there were some questions about M&B etc.

First off, the main reason that The Lady Soldier is not a M&B type historical is the focus. The focus in a M&B hisorical is much more squarely on the relationship between the hero and heroine and all the subplots hark back to the main plot which is the growth of the relationship. The Lady Soldier is more evenly divided between adventure and romance.


Second, there was a question about sensuality. M&B Historicals run the gamut from very sexy to not very much at all. It depends on the author, and to a certain extent the story. Robert Hale books in general have less of emphasis on the sensual. This may to be due in part to a difference in the main market. M&B Historicals' main market is North America. Robert Hale's main market is the UK. The historical woman's fiction market is different in both those markets. (In case, anyone wonders -- yes, The Gladiator's Honour has more of the sensual -- it is part of the promise M&B makes to its large number of readers)


There was also a question about historical research. As Kate Allan said -- we did a lot of research. For example in addition to the research on the Napoleonic War, we made sure that all the inns, pubs and theatres in London actually existed at that time.

The amount research that appears in a book should be the tip of the iceberg. There is a big issue in historical fiction writing circles, if you will, about whether or not you information dump. I am sure you have all read books where page after page is recounting of fact that does very little to further the story. With some authors, if you know the period, you can even tell which research books they used.

Both Kate and I feel that historical facts should be dribbled in, and should only be there if it enhances or furthers the story. We want readers to be focussing on the story, rather than on the history. The history should move the story forward rather than be there to show off how much research the author has done. Sometimes, information dumping can give historicals are reputation of being hard to read or even dense.

We also both feel that the story had to be possible within the historical context. (This goes for my M&B historicals as well) Accuracy is important. And I, for one, hate reading historical novels where I have to go -- okay in a galaxy far far away...


It did my heart good to see so many comments that The Lady Soldier was a pleasant read that passed a summer's afternoon. In that case, it did its main job which is to amuse, entertain and give an enjoyable read.



Michelle Styles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Michelle,

Great to see you here and well done on finishing the proofs!


One thing about writing novels is that it's not just about writing - stories have to be revised, copy-edited, proofed... all takes ages!


I'm also really pleased to see The Lady Soldier entertained. :) I also think it's done a little bit to raise the awareness of the subject of women serving in the historic military. I was asked a lot of questions about this when I did a radio interview recently.


btw I'm reading excerpts from The Lady Soldier at the Jane Austen Fayre in Basingstoke this weekend, Saturday and Sunday at 11.30am and 2.30pm both days, so if anyone is in the area and are looking for an historic day out - do come along and say hello! (Bring your copy if you'd like it signed.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


btw I'm reading excerpts from The Lady Soldier at the Jane Austen Fayre in Basingstoke this weekend, Saturday and Sunday at 11.30am and 2.30pm both days, so if anyone is in the area and are looking for an historic day out - do come along and say hello! (Bring your copy if you'd like it signed.)


Would love to come but Glasgow to Basingstoke is a bit of a hike - have a great time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I finished the book this weekend and I really enjoyed it - I felt quite disappointed when it ended as I wanted to watch their life for a bit longer - I truly bought into their romance.


When it started I did think it was a historical story and once I had got into it I did see a likeness to Mills & Boon - however I have always enjoyed the odd Mills & Boon here and there and so I was not downhearted. It was reminisent of M & B as the male lead was giving the impression he did not care fully for the female lead which is a classic story line in M & B. I thought there were classic lines such as tightening of the loins etc...


My favorite character was Tony as whilst we were reading his thoughts the thoughts were still selective and so at times he was a mystery as to his intentions.


I am happy with the ending and like to imagine that they start a life together without the pressures of society and on a more equal footing. I therefore do not feel the need for a sequel. I found myself thinking about the couple alot as I enjoyed their romance.


I would recommend it to my Mum and to a lady I work with who loves heroic romance.


I liked the action in the book too and I think it portrayed well the difficulties of being a woman and doing the action such as the impact onto her shoulder when shooting.


I would read books from the authors again especially if they pick unusual subjects again.


I would like to mirror the comments made before of thanks for the opportunity to read the book. I am much obliged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So glad you enjoyed the book, Amy.


Like you, both Kate and I like romance.


Each genre if you will has its own vocabulary (to a certain extent to meet reader expectation), thus there were classic romance lines. In much the same way as you would expect to see classic fantasy lines in a fantasy or crime lines in a mystery or even classic literary lines in a literary work. It was not until I read Diane Wynne Jones' Tough Guide to Fantasyland that I truly appreciated about fantasy being so formulaic. It is a must read for anyone interested in fantasy btw. Another book that explores the same issue is Self Editing for Ficiton Writers


For the writer, it is the challenge of making something seem unusual/different without losing the basic framework of the genre. or the over-riding story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Flingo
      Rescued Thread When Bill has caught up with some things, please can we have the forum for this back, and then get it moved? Cheers!

      Flingo 8th June 2006 11:06 PM

      I thought in Bill's absense we could start a couple of threads about Holes here and have the discussion that so many people are keen to do before we forget what we want to say. It should be able to be moved once the new board is open, shouldn't it?

      So what are people's first impressions? I know some people have finished it - but please remember anyone could call in here, so spoiler if necessary!

      I really enjoyed Holes. My children's librarian mentor has been urging me to read this for ages but I had never got round to it, and am now really disappointed that I left it so long!

      It's really clever, although it takes a bit to understand where all the threads of the story are going.

      The writing is so easy to read, and you feel drawn in almost immediately. I could felt the heat of Camp Green Lake radiating out of the book - a huge acheivement!

      megustaleer 8th June 2006 11:34 PM

      I read it some years ago, and loved it. I really don't know why it has not been a bigger hit as a 'crossover' book. I thought that the way all those plot threads were neatly tied up was just so satisfying, and so clever!

      Have just checked my reading list, and it is six years since I read it, and I can still remember quite a lot of it; it really made an impression!

      katrina 9th June 2006 06:02 PM

      Hey, this is my second read of this book in a year, as I had to read it at the start of my PGCE course, its a really popular keystage 3 yext. I prefered it this time around, the first time I was annoyed by it, but I can't remember why now.

      Thought the writing was good, and the sense of the lake and the heat were well depicted.

      Momo 9th June 2006 06:20 PM

      I can well imagine that it's six years since Meg read it. My oldest son read it when he was a year younger than my youngest one is now and he is five years older. It had just come out otherwise he would have done it earlier as my younger one has.
      Anyway, even though both my boys had read it, I never did so myself. Somehow it always seemed like a book for little boys. So, I was pleasantly surprised when it wasn't that at all. (We even have the DVD and I never watched that either!)
      I will recommend this book to anyone. It's a quick read, yet very interesting and there is a lot in this. More than last month's read.

      katrina 10th June 2006 08:30 AM

      I was wondering if anybody had watched the film version of the book, if I have time this week I'm going to borrow it from school and take a peak at it, I've heard its quite a good adaptation

      Flingo 10th June 2006 10:45 AM

      I picked it up on Wednesday, and will be watching it tomorrow.

      I think we ought to have a thread about the film in this section, so that we can discuss comparisons and similarities? Whoever watches it first can start that!

      megustaleer 16th June 2006 08:56 AM

      belweb says on another thread that she thought the plot was full of holes! I beg to differ! The thing that I like about this book is that there are no 'holes', everything is all neatly sewn up at the end!

      Admittedly a lot of the connections are contrived, but I thought that was part of the humour of the book. My reactions were along the lines of 'Well I Never!! and 'Who'd've Thought It!' , and I thought it was all very cleverly brought to a satisfying (if not necessarily satisfactory) conclusion.

      I wouldn't have accepted the neat conclusion in a serious adult novel, but 'Horses for Courses', eh? And there's plenty of food for thought in there, too.

      The book probably suffered from being read in the middle of reading for an Eng. Lit. degree. I'm sure it wouldn't stand comparison to the other books occupying belwebb's thoughts.

      Momo 16th June 2006 01:45 PM

      I don't know either what kind of holes belwebb saw in this novel. As Meg already mentions, and we all should consider this, this is a children's book. We cannot expect deep meanings that you will only understand after studying English Lit.

      belwebb 16th June 2006 05:28 PM
      Yes, you've made some valid points. However, when you say 'contrived' I think that's the word I should have used - it was incredibly contrived, but then, like you say, I was in the middle of an English lit course!

      elfstar 16th June 2006 06:38 PM

      I enjoyed this book, it had a nice 'roundness' to it,there was no unhappy or unresolvesd ending for the protagonist, the characters were not as deep as they could have been but it is a childrens book and a such it was very acceptable

      donnae 19th June 2006 11:17 PM

      I really enjoyed this book. I loved how the story of the past was neatly interlinked with Stanley's story. Contrived maybe, but very enjoyable still. At least it ties up a lot more ends than last month's read!

      As this was a children's story, I liked the manner in which the anti-racialism was dealt with, not too heavy-handed. There were some obvious morals going on in the book, but they didn't overshadow the story.

      There is a sequel to Holes called Small Steps. This follows the lives of Armpit and Xray.

      Holes is a book I will be encouraging my children to read - I think they will all enjoy it. One of my daughters has watched the film and enjoyed it. Flingo, have you watched it yet?

      Adrian 20th June 2006 01:50 AM

      I was thinking the same thing, donnae. It's pretty obvious when you read it.

      megustaleer 20th June 2006 09:34 PM

      Because it is a children's book, and apparantly a straightforward account of Stanley's misadventures, perhaps there is a tendency to whiz through it without picking up the clues?

      Once you know how it all fits together, of course, a lot of it was clearly hinted at in advance.

      Hindsight's a wonderful thing!

      Adrian 20th June 2006 09:52 PM

      I certainly did that, not giving the book its due respect and racing through it. I'll have to re-read it, or maybe listen to the audio version.

      Flingo 23rd June 2006 08:47 PM
      I did watch it - though it was really nicely done. Louis Sachar actually wrote the screenplay, which I think helped keeping it true to the book.

      Recommend watching it if you enjoyed the book.
    • By Adrian
      This is for people who have read just the first few chapters. If you haven't yet, reading the following will be a spoiler.

      I watched the R&J review and have bought the book. So far I'm maybe a dozen pages into it.

      I'm not loving the double first-person narrative. It reminds me of Kevin Sampson's Outlaws, where the same story is told from multiple viewpoints. I find it just detracts from the story, and makes the book feel a bit gimmicky. Maybe it'll grow on me as I read more, and it certainly won't stop me reading it.

      Secondly, I'm not yet buying into this "Chrono-Displacement Disorder" plot device. It's too Sci-Fi for my liking, and just too "handy" for the author: "I need to have the guy time travel, so here's how I've made it happen." I'm hoping it's resolved later on. If it's a premise I have to swallow just so the book could be written I'll be disappointed.

      As you might have guessed, I'm not wholly convinced just yet.

      What's your first impressions of the book?
    • By Adrian
      I'm about halfway through (he's spending Christmas with her family and has just found out her Mum's a manic depressive - and after reading this book, love, so am I), and unless I get I get some positive feedback here, I'm giving up.

      I posted my first impressions earlier, and I'm afraid it's getting worse.

      Firstly it didn't grab me from the start and I read other books inbetween - always a bad sign. Still, I vowed to stick with it, and once I got past the awkward narrative structure it improved. The enforced double-narrative seemed a little contrived, and I felt whenever the authour switched voices in mid-scene Niffenegger was really forcing the change of voice to make it obvious it was now the other person narrating. Seemed a bit like Kevin Samson writing in Outlaws, where each narrator gets his own unique voice.

      Secondly, the basic premise of the novel, time travel, is mishandled and cack-handedly written. Two versions of himself in the same time frame? (Believe me ladies, if we could do that to ourselves the human race would be extinct). Some evolutionary mishap in the human genome being allowed to rewrite the laws of physics? Those I could live with, but TTW is just an affront to basic common sense. I keep asking myself questions instead of losing myself in the book. Why just appear now? Why just disappear now? More important is the where? How does he go to a particular place as well a particular time?

      Also, the nastiness of the bloke: "I can't help myself so I can do whatever I like." Beat people up? Sure! Rob and steal? Why not! Buy stocks cheap? Who wouldn't! Run naked through the neighbourhood? Well, I tried this, and the police would just not believe my story!

      Most importantly, I don't care about the love story. So he loves her and they love each other, and so forth. I find both of them so insufferable that I don't care about their relationship(s).

      I'm half-heartedly interested in the secondary goings on. I like Kimy, and I like Clare's room-mate, but can't stand the room-mate's boyfriend.

      My current thinking is, "This is not a book to tossed away lightly. It is to hurled with great force."

      I'd like either an incentive to finish it (bearing in mind I have a long list of others waiting on my TBR pile) or, preferably, a precis of the ending. I'm guessing she dies of some disease he can't prevent, and he knows it (of course he knows it, he just can't get involved in any ethical situation that would ruin the house-of-cards plot), but doesn't tell her.

      God, I hate them both. Hey Audrey, try going back in time before Stephen Fry wrote Making History.
    • By Mad Dog & Glory
      Having finally finished The Time Traveler's Wife last night (yes, I know, I'm a bit behind), I was left feeling a little dissatisfied. I loved it for around 200 pages, but then I thought it tailed off badly and left a lot of unanswered questions. Not only the time travel - I had no problems with suspending disbelief, although the most unbelievable part was that they were allowed to lead a 'normal' life, rather than Henry being captured and studied by the US government.

      It's the so-called 'normal' life that concerns me. It seems incredible that I could read a 500+ page novel centring almost exclusively on two characters, and at the end not really have much of an idea of each other's personalities or how they went about their daily lives. At one point, Henry buys a lottery ticket knowing the result and wins several million dollars, so Clare can have a studio. No other mention is made of this. So are they millionaires? They seem to live in normal-sized house, in a normal street. So what do they do with themselves when Henry isn't time travelling? They're not watching TV, as Henry can't. They can't spend all of their time in bed.

      The other huge problem with the novel is lack of conflict, which is essential to all drama. Henry and Clare have this 'perfect' relationship, and are only unhappy with each other over the miscarriages. There were all sorts of potential themes and conflicts that Niffenegger shied away from. Why does Clare never question the fact that this man came into her life at the age of 5 and, as they say, ruined her for other men?
      Niffenegger seems so intent on making this the perfect love story that she misses a lot of tricks.

      My guess is that Audrey Niffenegger will be a one-hit wonder. She came up with a brilliant idea, and also came up with a good structure (although some disagree), and played out every permutation of time travelling possible. But in the end a great idea can get you only so far, and I don't feel she has the skills as a novelist to get as much out of the story as was potentially there.
  • Create New...