Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Shakespeares Sonnets

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone!


I'm an English Literature student and right now I have to write an essay comparing Sonnet 27 with Sonnet 130. So far, I've got two major differences, and one similarity (that they are both parodies). But I need another similarity please. The only thing I can come up with is the really obvious ones, which aren't what my tutor wants. (I'm thinking about iambic pentameter, sonnet structure, and that they're love poems).


I also read somewhere (outside of college stuff) that the first so many sonnets (including 27) were addressed to a man.


Outside of those points, I'd just like to hear what other people think of the sonnets in general.


Thanks for reading!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sonnet 130, which I adore, says it all really in the very last line:


[As] any she belied with false compare.


i.e. no woman's eyes are like the sun, hair is not like spun gold, and so on and so on. I think Shakespeare here is complaining about the prevalence of "bad" love poetry that makes "false compare" between the object of love and other things. He is mocking the fatuousness of such poetry. That he loves the woman he does is shown, I feel, more clearly in that "And yet, by heaven I think my love as rare". It's interesting to take each line and consider how true Shakespeare writes about coral, roses, perfume and music and then trying to compare them to anything about a human being. :)


Sonnet 27 I hadn't read before tonight, but to me it illustrates the pleasure and pain of love, especially new love; that when you're not with the new adored one, they fill your waking and what should be the sleeping hours.


And the sonnets you spoke of I believe were "dedicated to" rather than "addressed to" although I'm admittedly hazy on the conventions of the time. Apart from the first 17 (as collected by Thomas Thorpe) which all exhort a young man to marry.


I've no idea how useful my personal thoughts might be, but thought I'd share. xx

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shakespeares sonnets are beautiful, I like all poem.the shakespeares sonnet -18


Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? 
Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer's lease hath all too short a date: 
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimm'd; 
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance, or nature's changing course, untrimm'd;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow'st;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st; 
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, and Shakespeare is not the first - nor the last - to idealise love.  all the Elizabethans did it as a matter of course (not always as well as The Bard, of course).  For a counter-balance, try John Donne, a Jacobean rather than an Elizabethan of course.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Hazel
      I am not entirely sure that this is a 'great' project or why it is completely necessary. "To bring Shakespeare to a contemporary audience"? Well, his plays and sonnets have lasted over 400 years with lots of contemporary audiences to contend with and his popularity has rarely waned. I wonder if these 'cover versions' will simply be a re-working as in Jane Smiley's A Thousand Acres or a Baz Luhrman type restyling.
    • By Mr. Smith
      Was Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida pro or anti-war?
      What are some quotes, and solid reasons to back up each case?
    • By Adrian
      I don't have much to add apart from wanting to be the first to mention this play, but the world première supposedly happened hereabouts this week.
      I'm no Shakespearean scholar so I can't vouch for how lost this 'lost' play of his actually was.
    • By kelby_lake
      Outrageous that there is no thread on it!
    • By Hazel
      I came to Cymbeline completely anew, knowing nothing of the story, apart from the slim nugget that it was a 'romance'. I wasn't sure I wanted to read it either, after all, it's hardly one of those Shakey plays that has entered the collective consciousness. But the OU made me, as is so often the case with my life.
      King Cymbeline has a daughter Innogen who wants very much to marry Posthumus. In fact, she does secretly, much to Cymbeline's anger, and he banished Posthumus from the kingdom. Giacomo makes a bet with Posthumus that he will bed Innogen, after Posthumus's much boasted trust in his wife and English girls as a whole. Giacomo wins the bet - by nefarious means, and Post instucts Pisanio to kill Innogen. Pisanio, instead helps her disappear in Wales, disguised as a boy. Here she meets Belaruis and his two sons. Only, are they his sons?
      There is much in this play to enable it to be called a political play or even to be included in the Roman plays. It's up to the reader to decide if the Innogen/Posthumus plot is a subplot to the refusal of Cymbeline and his quite evil wife to pay Rome its treaty, therefore sparking a feud. Or vice versa. Ever the romantic (!), I much prefered the Inn/Post plot. Especially how Post could go from marrying the angelic, virtuous Innogen -the Madonna, to wanting her dead - the whore, and back again.
      The machinations of Giacomo make him a worthy villian, worthy of Iago-like notoriety. How he uses information to manipulate Posthumus is quite gripping.
      I believe George Bernard Shaw didn't like this play too much, criticisms of Innogen aside, he believed that the last act and the Welsh brothers plot was boring and incredible. Not in a good way, either. I can't agree - I think it is fairly typical Shakespeare: myriad plots that all tie up in the end with a satisfying resolution.
      I don't hold my chances well, but I'd love to see this forgotten and ignored play performed.