Jump to content

Hard Times


jfp
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you asked someone to name three Dickens novels off the top of their head, the chances are that Hard Times would not be one of them. People would tend to go for Great Expectations and David Copperfield (or whichever one had been serialised on the telly most recently). But it is certainly one of the easiest of the novels to read.

 

I mentioned in my review of Little Dorrit here that I found Dickens distinctly uneven, and I would maintain this position. It is true from novel to novel, and also within a particular novel. But Hard Times, stylistic unevenness aside, is a highly unified piece of writing, and the unity is contained in the way it throws into conflict the wisdom of the head and the wisdom of the heart, the way in which the ferociously, fanatically utilitarian Mr Gradrind has to face the consequences of his "philosophy" when his own children make disastrous messes of their lives.

 

I originally struggled through Hard Times when I was too young to cope with it, but reading it today I am struck by how relevant its themes remain today, just over 150 years since it was originally published. Presumably some of the people being blamed right now for the state the economy is in would easily recognise Mr Gradgrind and Mr Bounderby as their forbears.

 

Always supposing they were ever likely to open a "serious" novel in the first place, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I'm currently listening to an audiobook of the BBC's dramatisation of Hard Times which is excellent. I haven't read the book but may due now. I have found Dickens hard to read in the past. Have you read any Victor Hugo? I started The Hunchback of Notre Dame but gave up (I was ill at the time!). I have Les Miserables out of the library. I listened to the BBC's dramatisation on audiobook which was riveting but the book is SO long!! It is a fabulous story. Love the musical too!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you read any Victor Hugo? I started The Hunchback of Notre Dame but gave up (I was ill at the time!). I have Les Miserables out of the library.
Hello, The Maid! I found The Hunchback... impossible to put down, but gave up after three volumes (out of five) of Les Mis... It is much, much too long...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that I gave up with Les Mis, the book, thinking it was so long simply because I already knew the basic story thro' the BBC dramatisation and the musical. More fool me, I admit but I was ill at the time. I may try and read it again when I have finished my "to read" list. It is a cracking story and to experience it fully would be a good idea. I am currently reading and listening to North & South having seen the DVD first. I am realising that, although knowing the basic story helps, the book is SO much better and the portraits drawn of the main characters more vivid. I feel very sorry for Captain Lennox now whereas in the series I didn't give him a seconds thought. My resolve now is to pick a novel which I haven't seen adapted to the small or big screen and read it first then see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With respect... is that a serious question?
Yes, but I'm just curious and didn't mean any disrespect. I'm in the habit of reading books that are 500 + pages long and picking one up that's more than a thousand doesn't concern me at all - indeed, it's the shortness of the book that bothers me - so I was wondering why the length of a book would put somebody off. You can't tell just by looking at it if the entire length is necessary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but I'm just curious and didn't mean any disrespect.
LBMC, the expression "with respect" here means that I'm the one stressing that I don't wish to appear disrespectful...
so I was wondering why the length of a book would put somebody off.
It didn't put me off initially. I've read Proust twice and I'll read it again hopefully...

In a nutshell, I waded through I can't remember how many hundreds of pages and, quite simply, got bored... and because Les Mis is conveniently divided into five volumes (subdivided into books, subdivided into chapters, of which there are 365...), the end of the third volume seemed like a good place to cut my losses... (I hate giving up, but Les Mis joined the ranks of War and Peace and The Lord of The Rings Oh, and The Bible... Now that really is too long...)

You can't tell just by looking at it if the entire length is necessary.
As one actress said to another...

 

Sorry... I'm being frivolous :o I'm behind with tomorrow's lessons... (God I hate George Orwell...) :o

 

Erm, the thread was on Hard Times anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

I listened to hard times as an unabridged audiobook earlier this year.

I knew nothing about it in advance, and was surprised how short it was, but found it quite engrossing.

As jfp says in his OP, the themes of the book remain relevant today - in fact our education system seems to get more and more utilitarian with each passing year.

At least Gradgrind saw the error of his ways by the end of the novel, but not until he had caused much unhappiness, even to his own children

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By lunababymoonchild
      I read the Wordsworth Classics version because it had illustrations and said that it was complete and unabridged. The phrase 'hear me out' was used quite a lot and I wondered if Dickens had actually written that.  It certainly seemed to jar with the other more formal prose.  I struggled a little bit with the more formal prose but I like to struggle with my reading so enjoyed it all the more. 
       
      The story is the life and times of one Nicholas Nickelby.  Too long to even surmise here and anyway it's well enough known.  The characters (and their names!) were flawless and the story also so.  It had a cast of thousands but I didn't need to write them down in order to feel I knew them and their respective roles. 
       
      My copy was very long, some 769 pages so it's a time investment, but one worth making, imho.
       
      Recommended.
    • By Carly
      This is my favourite of Dickens' novels, it's so complex. It's long but if you're thinking of reading Dickens for the first time I don't think you can really go wrong with this novel. The story is complex and intriguing. It's maybe a bit predictable to the modern reader, but at the time readers would have been on tenterhooks, especially as it was published episodically!
       
      I do think the main narrator, Esther is a bit of an old priss, but it doesn't affect my enjoyment of the book. What do other people think? Do you think Esther is a bit two faced or just a wet rag?!
    • By David
      Restored Thread
       
      #1 17th September 2006, 10:32 PM
      Phoebus
       
      I'm going to start reading Little Dorritt in about six weeks. Is anyone interested in reading it with me?
       
      Phoebus
       
      Post Script: Have just realised that I've already asked this in another post but never got around to starting it with anyone...
       
      #2 19th September 2006, 07:01 PM
      Barblue
       
      I am on a Dickens trip at the moment. After getting involved with the Great Expectations thread I feel totally immersed in it. Added to this my local reading group has decided to read Hard Times over the next few weeks. I have also promised myself I will go back to The Old Curiosity Shop if only to look at Nell following some comments made by David recently.
       
      I have never read Little Dorritt but would love to. Provided I can find the time in a few weeks, I will start to read it and watch for any further comments on this thread.
       
      #3 21st September 2006, 06:41 PM
      Phoebus
       
      Thank you Barblue. I'll look forward to reading this with you. Let me know when you're thinking of starting it about two weeks before and I'll try and pace myself to finish the books that I'll be reading in time. PM as well just to make sure that I see your post.
       
      All the best,
       
      Phoebus
       
      #4 1st November 2006, 07:57 AM
      Barblue
       
      You know Phoebus, I really do intend to read Little Dorrit just as soon as I can, but somehow a lot of other books have got in the way lately. I have two reading group reads, one of which is Middlemarch - slightly time consuming - and also some other reads I have committed myself to for various reasons. It looks, at this moment in time, as if I will be making Little Dorrit a New Year's Resolution. Not sure if you want to wait that long, but I thought it only fair to let you know my situation. Many apologies for my tardiness. Barblue
       
      #5 5th November 2006, 12:10 PM
      Phoebus
      No worries Barblue. I've lot of other reads to ge through. Ready when you are !
       
      Phoebus
       
      #6 5th January 2007, 08:13 PM
      Phoebus
       
      I've been moving house in the last couple of weeks so haven't had much time for reading and posting. I started Little Dorrit on New Year's Day and having read a couple hundred pages, I'm loving it. I'll keep you all informed.
       
      Phoebus
       
      #7 5th January 2007, 08:45 PM
      Mungus
       
      Well done, Phoebus. There seems to be a general groundswell of good vibes towards Dickens on the forum at the moment so I'm sure someone will join you soon, especially if you are able to tempt us with an effusive review.
       
      #8 Yesterday, 07:46 PM
      Barblue
       
      Phoebus, I am so sorry that I have not joined you on this exercise. I will try and start it this week, but can't promise anything. Great to know that you are enjoying it though and like Mungus I will be delighted to hear more of your comments in due course.
    • By Hilary
      I have started this book today. I'm only a few pages in and already I'm feeling low level outrage at the treatment of the poor big sister of the Son in the title! I'm expecting it to increase! It's rather odd entering into a Dickens book with only the sketchiest of outlines of the plot.
    • By Jeremy DEagle
      Well, I'm a few chapters into this and quite enjoying it. I do try to read a few classics in between my fantasy/sci fi novels so I look slightly better read than I actually am!
       
      I have very little to compare it to- having only read 'A Christmas Carol' by Dickens before.
×
×
  • Create New...