Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Seraphina

Jude the Obscure

Recommended Posts

I'm almost done with this book and like it or not I keep relating to the comment in this thread http://www.bookgrouponline.com/forum/showthread.html?t=3884&highlight=jude+obscure that reading Jude is 'like being hit in the face over and over again'! It really is, I am reading it and constantly groaning at what new misadventures befall Sue and Jude, shouting at Sue for being so pig-headed and at Jude for being so weak.

 

That said, I wouldn't say I dislike the novel - I've been compelled to keep going back to it, I want to find out what happens in the end, although I'm dreading it really as I'm sure it's not going to make me feel any better about it! I always knew the gist of the story, was aware of the incident with the children, but I really was unprepared for just how depressing a read this book is.

 

It's definitely made me want to find out more about Hardy's life at the time, e.g. was his marriage unhappy, what were his religious views, as if he wasn't writing from personal experience, where did all this seeming bitterness come from? Is it just a story or does it reflect Hardy's life?

 

Interesting. I may post again when I've finished (only another few chapters to go).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seraphina,

 

I'd love to know what you think of Jude, when you get to the end. (I can't quite remember how it ends, but I wouldn't hold your breath for a fairy tale happy ending ;) )

 

I'm at a loss to explain my attraction to this book. It's so bleak and unhappy - and the "incident with the children" (great phrase!) was shattering. And yet - I love this book so much, and I have no idea why.

 

Partly, I think I identified with Jude very strongly at the beginning - when he's gazing at the skyline of Oxford with such longing...but there must be more to it than that.

 

It's been a while since I read it - maybe I'll dig it out again for another go.

 

Anyone seen the film? I remember that I enjoyed that too - but beyond that, I can't remember much about it. (Kate Winslett??)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are surely few Victorian novels as powerful and disturbing as Jude The Obscure; I don't know if I ever saw the film, but I certainly recall the shocked disbelief of a number of people who did and, not knowing the novel, hadn't known what was coming.

 

For all that, I felt that Claire Tomalin's comparison with being hit in the face over and over again (which I quoted and which, Seraphina, you linked to) was inappropriate and exaggerated: I would contend that Hardy goes about things much more effectively and subtly than having one's face smashed in might suggest...

 

Despite that, I highly recommend the biography, Seraphina, if your curiosity about Hardy's own life has been whetted. And, as I mentioned in my review, there's one bit in there even more shocking than anything in Jude... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second jfp's recommendation of Claire Tomalin's biography.

 

Like many writers, Hardy reworked bits of his own and his family's experiences into his novels, but I wouldn't look for real biographical detail.

As for his marriage to Emma...well, Jude didn't do much to promote marital harmony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I really was unprepared for just how depressing a read this book is.QUOTE]

Oh no! How have I known you for so long without warning you about Jude the Obscure?!! I'm firmly on the 'hate it' side of the fence but mainly because I'm not very good at empathy i think!! I just kept thinking if only he'd accept the way things are and tried to be happy instead of succesful everything would be OK! Stupid man! Is that harsh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall have to re-read it soon for my U3A class - this will be for the third time. It is the only one I've read more than once, and I am looking forward to it. Like Claire, I don't know why I like it so much.

Perhaps I'm hoping Jude will make different decisions the next time I read it? Or does that mean I am insane?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read it again I still like it, but still don't know why. It's certainly not an attachment to either of the main characters.

Jude Fawley is a romantic who makes bad choices and brings misfortune down upon his own head.

Sue Bridehead is so self-centred that she doesn't care what effects her insistence of living up to her (changing) principles has on other people

 

Although this was the third time I have read it I had forgotten the incident that sticks in most peoples minds, although I was not surprised when it happened.

 

I have a taste for harrowing stories, so maybe that is what attracts me to this book :D

 

I do get irritated by those who try to stitch much of Hardy's biography onto the fabric of this novel. Certainly Hardy drew on his own background, and the life he knew as a child amongst the rural poor of Dorset and the wider area of 'Wessex' but he uses aspects of that life to a greater or lesser extent in his other novels, and his poetry.

 

While his earlier novels sit comfortably in the rural past that Hardy knew and heard tell of in his childhood, Jude is Hardy's attempt to face, and foretell the changes that are coming about as the world heads for the 20th century. Sue is attempting to become the 'New Woman' before the world is quite ready for her, and Hardy's critics are not ready to face the changes in society that this novel presages.

 

I can see why Emma took herself off to the attic when she read this :eek: - and why he didn't let her see it when he was writing it.

 

Hardy wrote two versions of this book simultaneously, a 'milder' version as magazine serial, and a more shocking complete novel form. There were other changes in at least one later edition, and that may affect the readers view of Sue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is interesting how Sue seems to have made more of an impact than Arabella. Arabella is probably one of the reasons I think this novel is so great. I think she is a welcome relief to the interminable depression of Jude and Sue's lives. The way that she manages to have such a full life (travelling to Australia, remarrying etc.) without really trying creates a sad irony in comparison to Sue's struggle to become a 'new-woman'. Although she is not a particularly likable character it did make me question what Hardy wanted to show through her character.

 

I saw the film with Kate Winslet as Sue before I read the novel. Arabella didn't seem to make such an impression on me as when reading the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I found Sue to be a more complex, contradictory character, so spent more time wondering what made her tick.

 

Arabella did what was good for Arabella 'in the moment'. She certainly made a refreshing contrast to Jude and Sue's tender consciences, and soul-searching.

 

 

Edit:

Welcome to BGO, Dmitri1710.

There is a thread for new members to introduce themselves up in the Central Library. It would be good if you could pop in there and tell us just a little about yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read this recently. I have to say it didn't grip me quite the same way as Madding crowd did. But eventually I felt very close to it. As a working class girl daring to study a degree I felt quite linked to Jude's longings. I do wish though that Mr Hardy had moved away from the naturalist/realist approach and given Jude a happy ending. Seemed to be a hefty dose of sattire in it.

 

Oh and the children

:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By elliejean28
      Over the last several months I have been reading one of the most talked about pieces of feminist literature from the Victorian era. Admittedly, it has taken me a long time to finish this masterpiece but it was so worth the wait.
       
      I spent the entirety of this novel with my heart throbbing in my chest as Hardy depicted the horrific lives of women in the 1800s with such honest brutality. I have been dying to write this blog post to explore my thoughts on this book which is so arguably relevant today, especially during this week's light on sexual harassment.
       
       
    • By cherrypie
      I am about a quarter of the way through this book it having been recommended to me by a friend. Having read a number of Thomas Hardy books in the past she remembers this of all of them as being her favorite. Having read many books by Thomas Hardy myself I have to admit that I am not sure so far why she was so keen on this book in particular.
       
      As with all Thomas Hardy books the book is beautifully written. So far the reader has met few but the main characters as the story takes place in a very small community. The main characters are Elfride the daughter of the local vicar, the vicar himself and Stephen Smith an assistant of a London architect. Stephen comes to stay with the family for a short time to complete drawings of the church and tower which are in need of repair. Although perfectly likable Elfide and Stephen are no Gabriel Oak or Bathsheba Everdene and the story so far although pleasent is very slow moving. As my friend, whose recommendations are usually sound, enjoyed the book so much I can only assume that the story will get going eventually.
    • By David
      Restored Thread
       
      Hazel 12th December 2006 04:29 PM
       
      Bathsheba inherits a farm and with it 3 suitors determined to marry her, but she makes a bad choice and with this choice comes great tragedies. The plot as simple as I can make it.
       
      This was my first Hardy book and I will definitely go on to read more. I really loved the names that Hardy gave to his characters: Gabriel Oak; the solid, decent, dependable shepherd, Farmer Boldwood; the middle-aged, stern and forthright farmer, and Francis Troy, the philandering rake who is also a soldier.
       
      It is the events that appear out of character that cause much of the tragedy here and to Hardy's credit the events are credible and almost inevitable. My favourite creation of Hardy's was to make the normally laconic Boldwood, desperate, needy and bullying as he begs Bathsheba to promise to marry him on a number of occasions. I was actually embarrassed for him and felt a great deal of discomfort as Bathsheba squirmed.
       
      I am not normally enamoured with country novels, or descriptions of the land and animals that go with this kind of novel but it seemed a perfect setting for this tale and was as much a character within as any of the humankind.
       
      Surprised how much I enjoyed this and regretful that I have lived Hardy-free for so long!
       
      David 12th December 2006 05:26 PM
       
      Great novel, Hazel, and I'm quite envious at what you have left to discover! I also enjoyed those characters and Hardy really is skilful at taking people whom you would not think to be particularly endearing, yet giving them something through which we can empathise. Not just Boldwood, but the foolish, vain Bathsheba too. Some classic scenes, including the gloriously symbolic sword exercises Troy demonstrates to Bathsheba!
       
      I'm also a huge fan of the rustic chorus, who just crack me up: some fantastic characters! You also begin to see Hardy's elegy for the disappearing ways of life in the country as the Industrial Revolution moves out from the cities to mechanise the fields. There is a sense of both celebration and sadness.
       
      The inevitability you mention, Hazel, is a key concept in his writing - the idea of character being fate, as well as the patterns and cycles in lives on both the small scale of the individual as well as the grand scale of humanity form the backbone of his thinking.
       
      This novel, when looked at across Hardy's work, always has the feel for me of one of Shakespeare's later comedies, such as Twelfth Night: much to amuse, but a dark undertone that threatens to consume. Just as the darkness breaks out in Shakespeare's tragedies, so that happens here with the later books, The Mayor of Casterbridge, Tess of the d'Urbervilles and Jude the Obscure. They have less of the lightness, but they are much the better novels.
       
      chuntzy 12th December 2006 07:00 PM
       
      Both of the above messages have brought back some good memories of reading Thomas Hardy. I, too, started with 'Far From the Madding Crowd' and then the novels David mentions. The last one I read was 'Jude the Obscure'. A terrific writer: I'll just have to borrow the latest biography of him by Claire Tomalin.
    • By Momo
      Tess of the d'Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy - 1891
       
      I couldn't really find a short synopsis describing enough of the story without revealing too much.
       
      Tess Durbeyfield is a girl from a poor family who is thrown into a difficult situation without any fault of herself. This will determine her later life which is not a happy one.
       
      This novel certainly belongs to the tragic ones. A friend of mine said it was the most horrible book she ever read. But usually we disagree about books. As we do this time. I loved this novel. Of course, I didn't like everything that happened to Tess or the other girls in the story, but the way Hardy describes the ordinary people's lives and the countryside is just great. I really enjoyed reading this book.
    • By Adrian
      Based on this thread, this is week one's discussion. Everyone is welcome to participate, though this is primarily geared towards people who appreciate poetry but have not studied it in any academic programme.
       
      <blockquote>The Voice, Thomas Hardy
       
      Woman much missed, how you call to me, call to me,
      Saying that now you are not as you were
      When you had changed from the one who was all to me,
      But as at first, when our day was fair.
       
      Can it be you that I hear? Let me view you, then,
      Standing as when I drew near to the town
      Where you would wait for me: yes, as I knew you then,
      Even to the original air-blue gown!
       
      Or is it only the breeze, in its listlessness
      Travelling across the wet mead to me here,
      You being ever dissolved to existlessness,
      Heard no more again far or near?
       
      Thus I; faltering forward,
      Leaves about me falling,
      Wind oozing thin through the thorn from norward,
      And the woman calling.</blockquote>
       
       
      Core question
       
       
      And one of the following three questions
       
       
      I'm quite happy for this to sit in Writers' Corner if it's better there.
×
×
  • Create New...