Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Grammath

The Road to Wigan Pier/Down and Out in Paris and London

Recommended Posts

Grammath 26th January 2006 04:44 PM

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Road to Wigan Pier/Down & Out in Paris & London

 

I'm reading "The Road to Wigan Pier" at the moment and am finding it one of the best things I've read for a while. I also read "Down and Out in Paris and London" a couple of years ago and am coming to the conclusion that Orwell was as good, it not better, a non-fiction writer as he was a novelist.

 

"Down and Out...", published in 1933, recounts Orwell's experience of poverty in both cities. Part One covers Paris where he worked in conditions he describes as nearly equivalent to slavery, first in a hotel and then a restaurant whose financial difficulties mean he isn't even paid the pittance which passes as his wages. The only relief comes from drinking.

 

Back in England, Orwell becomes what would generally be regarded as a tramp, living in shelters on bread and tea, and constantly being moved on.

 

The main thing that stayed with me was the relentless monotony and drudgery of the life Orwell described and how difficult it was to break the cycle.

 

"The Road to Wigan Pier" came 4 years later. This is a book of two halves too, the first being observations of slum life in Lancashire and Yorkshire, particularly focussing on the working conditions of coal miners and the lives of the unemployed. This, remember, was at the height of the Depression, so life was pretty unpleasant for a lot of people.

 

Orwell then moves into an autobiographical mode, explaining how he arrived at his Socialist beliefs but at the same time attacking those who are overly doctrinaire and ideological in their beliefs.

 

One could, I suppose, argue that the lack of statistics and empirical data mean that overall these are very subjective works and simply the point of view of one left-wing journalist from quite a privileged background (Orwell went to Eton). Personally, I found both books full of astute insights, passionate and sometimes contentious arguments and making many points that are still relevant 70 years after they were first published in a concise (both are around 200 pages), clear and straightforward way.

 

Lady Lazarus 10th December 2006 07:47 PM

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I've just finished Down & Out and really enjoyed it. As I work with homeless people in one of the parts of London Orwell describes, I found it fascinating to see his portrayal of them and what he made of it all. The stories about the characters he meets in London and Paris are often amusing but poignant at the same time. I found Orwell's experience quite different to my own perceptions of the homeless in London, but perhaps because I am a nurse I only see the drunk ones!

 

The best part for me was the last few pages, where Orwell gives his insights into what might be done to help 'tramps' living in hostels, and why there are so few women on the streets. Also enjoyed Orwell's stories about his Russian friend Boris in Paris. I wonder what all his 'tramp' friends would make of him putting them in the book?

 

For some reason I never realised until I read it in this thread that The Road To Wigan Pier was a non-fiction work :o, so I will definitely add it to the TBR pile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just started to read The Road to Wigan Pier and have to agree with you Grammath, Orwell is a very good writer. And how surprising too, but why I should think that I don't know. I have never read any of Orwell before, but somehow I didn't expect it to be so accessible. I hope to come back when I've finsihed the book and comment again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's some years since I read this and I remember how vividly he conveys the conditions he found in the north during that time. I found particularly interesting the passages in which he describes the typical diets of the workers and the unemployed. The fitness and stature of many of those called-up in the Second World War must have appalled the authorities (or am I getting mixed up with the First World War?).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that link interesting, Grammath. I wonder if Orwell would have been surprised that his book was going to be mined for an article on the U.S presidential election seventy years afterwards and in the U.S. itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently struggling with Down and Out... I will confess I hadn’t realised it was autobiographical until I googled it at 50pages in. I am enjoying the quality of Orwell’s writing, but haven’t warmed to him as a person, so am feeling really ambivalent about his situation. 

It does feel like it could have been written much more recently than 1933 though - the vocabulary, writing style and descriptions and sense of place feel like they could have applied right through to the end of the century. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poverty tourism. 

 

Any other writer would have been condemned for it by now. Orwell will be afforded a honeymoon period. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Dr. Strangelove
      I really enjoyed this book. Orwell is a very talented writer who engages you and makes you grow to love the different characters.
       
      Oceania, Eastasia, and Eurasia are the three battling superstates. Each has an identical government—one that is at perpetual war in order to gain complete power over its inhabitants. Big Brother manipulates its citizens into convenient modes of thinking. However, instead of only using propaganda techniques, Big Brother also uses Newspeak and telescreens. Newspeak is the official language of Oceania, and has its sole purpose in abolishing all unorthodox thought. (Example: the word bad is replaced by the word ‘ungood.’) The telescreens monitor each citizen that is allowed to be educated, at all times, watching for any action, word, or possible thought that could be unorthodox.
       
      When Winston is secretly approached by a coworker, he learns that he is not alone in his belief that Big Brother is ‘ungood.’ Winston and Julia become lovers and eventually confess their feelings of rebelliousness to O’Brien, a fellow coworker who is believed to be a member of a rebel group, the Brotherhood.
       
      "Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else," says O’Brien. " . . . In the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be truth is truth."
       
      Political tragedies, such as this, are published constantly, but 1984 is one of the few that has remained timeless and will always be regarded as not only historical, but also prophetic. The book reminds us of what has gone wrong, what can go wrong, and what will go wrong when government becomes all-powerful.
    • By Grammath
      Having been hugely impressed by "Down and Out in Paris and London" and "The Road to Wigan Pier", I had high expectations of "Homage to Catalonia", Orwell's account of his experiences fighting for the Anarchist POUM in the Spanish Civil War.
       
      However, in comparison to the two earlier books, I found it somewhat lacking, but for me this was as much to do with the subject matter as the author, whose expresses his views as trenchantly and incisively as ever.
       
      The political situation, about which I knew little before reading this book, was a complex one with numerous factions of Anarchists, Communists, Fascists and government troops involved. Consequently, there is a lot of exposition along the way that affects the narrative flow, a shame after the clear and direct approach of the two earlier books, but understandable. It is as much a piece of reportage as a book so even then there's things the contemporary reader would find obscure I suspect their 1930s counterparts would have known.
       
      Orwell captures the boredom and chaos of war - much time is spent sitting in trenches in uniform that is falling apart armed with rifles that jam awaiting orders that never come. Unfortunately, boredom is a difficult subject to relate without also boring the reader to some extent. There are sudden explosions of activity, and eventually Orwell is invalided out.
       
      It is fascinating to read this book and be able to draw parallels with modern warfare. One chapter is devoted to how the press manipulate people's perceptions of the war and the various groups involved which, in these days of embedded journalists, still feels highly relevant.
       
      I'd still steer those wanting to sample Orwell's nonfiction work in the direction of "The Road to Wigan Pier" first, but this is a decent attempt to present one man's experiences in a war zone and a complex historical situation.
    • By Jeremy DEagle
      Ok... People want more threads about books so here goes!
       
      First of all I'm amazed that there isn't a thread about this book already. I did do a search but couldn't seem to find it.
       
      I read it some years ago and thoroughly enjoyed it. Now that I'm more aware of the political themes running through the book I'm keeping my eye out for it more.
       
      I'm trying to think now if I noticed it the first time or if I just read it as a book. I think I probably did notice it but didn't pay it much attention which got me thinking.... Do I read books in a shallow way, by this I mean do I just read the story and not pick up any hidden nuances or meaning?
       
      I think the answer is possbly yes, when I read other peoples reviews etc I see people linking what the author was writing about to a whole range of other stuff. I just read the book and enjoy the story!
       
      I'm five or six chapters in now (at least) and I'm thoroughly enjoying it. It amazes me in a way how the size of books has grown over the years. If Animal Farm was written today then I'm sure it would be several times longer as well...
    • By bella_1987
      A Clergyman's Daughter was written as one of Orwell's most experimental pieces and was highly critiqued by the author himself- so much so, that Orwell refused to allow the reprinting of the book during his lifetime.
      As with Orwell's other books, it takes a grim look at the inequality of society. His particular grudge points are the conditions incurred by the manual labourers and the capitalist structure of private schools.
       
      The book is written in five clear chapters.
      The first documenting a day in the life of Dorothy Hare- the Clergyman's Daughter. Focusing on the drudgery of a low-paid, menial life with no hope of independance and the self-harm she inflicts inorder ot reprimand herself for unpure thoughts.
      Chapter two, sees Dorothy awaken in London, suffering from amnesia. She falls in with a group who take her hop-picking. After the job ends, she returns to London, but when her money runs out she finds herself living on the streets.
       
      The third chapter is written entirely in dramatic dialogue.
      The following chapter sees Dorothy offered a job as a school mistress in a third class school.
      The fifth chapter sees her return.
       
      I decided to read A Clergyman's Daughter as I have previously enjoyed some of Orwell's other efforts.
      But, I did not find this as easily accessible as Animal Farm or Nineteen Eighty Four. It was not until the fourth chapter that I found myself wanting to read further. The first two chapters were tedious and prolonged. I had to continue to force myself through the dramatic chapter (this is perhaps more to do with my own aversion to dramtic dialogue).
      And yet, once finished, I looked back on the book as insightful and deeply probing of the subject matter afore mentioned. I work not look to read this again but it has made my curiosity surrounding Orwell's other works greater.
    • By Tay
      Gordon Comstock, ‘aged twenty-nine and rather moth-eaten already’, is a troubled man. Poverty, work, squalor, sex, or the lack of it, poetry and the struggle to create it, all eat away at him.
       
      Orwell’s third novel published in 1936 is once again partially autobiographical. His time living rough on the streets including a night in the cells and his job in a bookshop provide a modicum of colour for this grey bleak story.
       
      Comstock is a hard man to like he rejects money refusing to take a well-paid job as a copywriter as he feels it will demean him
      but he constantly bemoans his lack of money and the comfort it might bring him. 
       
      A writer of poetry - one small volume to his name – which languishes in the remainder piles of bookshops, Comstock vainly struggles on with his ‘magnum opus’ in a cold, poorly lit, rented room trying to hold onto his integrity, all the time borrowing money from his long suffering half-sister to survive.
       
      Comstock has a girlfriend but like money he constantly pushes her away then regrets not being able to ‘provide’ for her.
       
      One review of this novel called it ‘grimly comic’. Well it definitely is grim. Think of the people J B Priestley meets ‘up north’ in his ‘English Journey’ but without the grit and determination to survive. But I found no comedy here just the gradual decay of a human soul, fighting a losing battle against the capitalist society that wanted to save him.
       
      Orwell as usual shows us a darker side of humanity he brings the squalor home to us, sitting it beside ‘our middle class aspidistra life’ and asks us to consider our good fortune. The only problem I had with this novel is I didn’t like Gordon Comstock he made me want to shout at him, tell him to stick to a job, to even take the better job, to marry the girl, to enjoy life. In essence to stop feeling so sorry for himself, to stop thinking
      because that way leads to despair, to an unnourished mind caught in the downward spiral of desperation.  
      But don’t take my word for it – read it for free at
       
      http://www.george-orwell.org
×
×
  • Create New...