Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I thoroughly enjoyed this.


I've never read him before and only know him through reputation, namely that of a racist misogynist (though in today's climate that applies to people who make the 'okay' hand gesture so I'll take that with a pinch of salt). I'm not sure what all the fuss is about; he describes sex. What of it? Anyway, I wonder how many people have been put off him by virtue of a media that are full of hypocrites. I absolutely loved this. It was like being nourished by food, a feeling I haven't had while reading for quite some time. My interest was waning somewhat by the final third but that tends to happen with every book (all books, in my opinion being longer than they need to be). It picked up again after that and was a delight. My only criticism would be the epilogue. It essentially transforms the novel from a story about brothers to a peculiar science fiction romp that wasn't remotely necessary. I could have done without that in truth. 


The story is essentially two half brothers (Bruno and Michel) who have no real bond until adulthood. Bruno is obsessed with sex while Michel is almost asexual with only an interest in his scientific work. I must say, I found it hard to believe Michel as a character but complete understood Bruno. That may say more about me. 


I'm not sure what Houellebecq was trying to say by giving the two women in the brother's lives such tragic endings. Maybe that's where the misogyny accusation comes from. He seems to be suggesting that their sexual freedom is the very thing that has ruined their lives and left them unfulfilled as women. To be fair, that seems to be exactly what Sally Rooney was also saying in 'Normal People' too yet I doubt she gets accused of being a misogynist. The book is clearly about our 'atomised' western societies and how we have lost meaning so I'm not sure the criticism is valid. It's kinda the point. 


Very Good. Will read some more of him at some point. 

Edited by hux
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By iff
      Review of four Soldiers by hubert Mingarelli, translated Sam Taylor
      Four Soldiers is set during the Russian Civil War in 1919, somewhere on the front near Romanian and as the title tells us, there are four soldiers as part of a company of the Red Army who have been ordered to the woods on the borders with Romania waiting for orders to decamp. There is the narrator from Kirov (well the city now known as Kirov), the intelligent Pavel who has made plans for the their hut for sleeping so that they are protected, Uzbek soldier Kyabine, a guy who really shouldn't gamble his tobacco in games of Dice as he doesn't win (a thought while reading is how can you lose so many games of Dice, which would be a game of chance?). Kyabine reminds me of lenny from Of Mice & Men, he is a very strong, diligent hardworker but not clever and then there is the quiet sifra who can put a gun together with his eyes closed.  Threre is a guardedness to them when forced to take on a fifth soldier to their hut by the Lieutenant, a young teenager enlisted from the Lake Ladoga area but  after they realise he isn't going any where, there is a paternal protectiveness towards the new recruit.
      the conditions are hard but with the help of each of the four working together in the base, they have made the best of what they can. For example, at there hut they have used tins to protect from rain and when they had been in retreat from the Polish front, they got a tarp for protection.
      The narrative is minimalist and Taylor's translation is similar to his superb translation of David foenkinos' Charlotte. There is a really good restraint to it and it works really well in this to create the feeling that as well as the reader, the soldiers in the sense of them waiting for orders but wanting to take it easy. As the song goes, the waiting is the hardest part. .
      another quote was from the war series generation war, the line being about after a while fighting for your friends and i got the real sense that the four soldiers main purpose now is not the cause of socialism, socialism never being mentioned, but they have stuck it out for each other, to be there for them.
      I thought this was a superb novel and finished it in one day (it is also only 150 pages.
      * * * * *
  • Create New...