megustaleer
17th April 2005, 09:00 AM
I have just finished the first chapter, and was greatly irritated when it finished in the middle of a sentence.
As it is widely known that the first half of the book consists of the beginning of six stories that continue in reverse order in the second half, ending with the story it started with, I sneaked a look at the start of the last chapter. Yes, the sentence continues there. A quick glance at the next story revealed that the second section seems to be a continuation of the letters in the earlier part.
The Temptation is to read the whole of each story straight off, as though it was just a series of short stories, and not bother with the order in which it is laid out.
Before I give in to this temptation, can someone tell me that there is a point to this strange construction? Am I going to miss something vital if I don't resist?
At the moment I feel that D.M. just took half a dozen short manuscripts and
divided each roughly in half, put them in two piles, stacked one on top of each other and said 'There's a book to set reviewers talking!'
It is not that I have any particular problem with unusually constructed books (I enjoyed 'Time's Arrow'), but I need to believe there's a point to it, and that it's not just a shot at a 'literary' award.
As it is widely known that the first half of the book consists of the beginning of six stories that continue in reverse order in the second half, ending with the story it started with, I sneaked a look at the start of the last chapter. Yes, the sentence continues there. A quick glance at the next story revealed that the second section seems to be a continuation of the letters in the earlier part.
The Temptation is to read the whole of each story straight off, as though it was just a series of short stories, and not bother with the order in which it is laid out.
Before I give in to this temptation, can someone tell me that there is a point to this strange construction? Am I going to miss something vital if I don't resist?
At the moment I feel that D.M. just took half a dozen short manuscripts and
divided each roughly in half, put them in two piles, stacked one on top of each other and said 'There's a book to set reviewers talking!'
It is not that I have any particular problem with unusually constructed books (I enjoyed 'Time's Arrow'), but I need to believe there's a point to it, and that it's not just a shot at a 'literary' award.