excalibur
31st March 2005, 04:08 PM
The annual Boat race, fought between Cambridge and Oxford has achieved almost indelible immortality, becoming a noteworthy fixture in the sporting calendar. Yet, there still remain those unfashionable and unbearably traditionalist curmudgeons (including, dare I say it, myself.) who insist on denouncing this most revered sporting institution as having become too modernised for it own liking. One corporation who subscribed to this belief, was the BBC, who in 2004, sold the broadcasting rights to ITV, citing that ‘with increased modernisation comes increased commercialisation,’ which, as we all know, from the BBC’s perspective is a disagreeable ‘four-letter word’. One possibly contentious consequence of this modernisation programme is how increasingly cosmopolitan the two universities rowing crews have become, a development which can only be to the detriment of the drive to nurture home-grown talent for the forthcoming 2008 Olympic games and those proceeding it in the future.
Yet those arguing in favour of modernisation, subscribe to the belief that in order for a more entertaining and closely competed boat race, both crews, have to base their recruitment not according to nationality but on the quality of the rowers, irrespective of whether or not their allegiances lie abroad.
I, personally, agree with the former viewpoint, yet what does the boat race mean to everyone else?
Yet those arguing in favour of modernisation, subscribe to the belief that in order for a more entertaining and closely competed boat race, both crews, have to base their recruitment not according to nationality but on the quality of the rowers, irrespective of whether or not their allegiances lie abroad.
I, personally, agree with the former viewpoint, yet what does the boat race mean to everyone else?