PDA

View Full Version : The City and the City


Grammath
7th October 2011, 12:23 PM
Tyador Borlu is an Inspector with the Extreme Crimes Squad in the rundown city of Beszel, possibly somewhere in post-Soviet eastern Europe. He is called upon to investigate the murder of a female student.

Beszel is, however, no ordinary city. It co-exists in the same physical space as the wealthier Ul Qoma. However, the citizens of each city are trained from an early age to "unsee" manifestations of the other, to erase it from their minds. In some areas, the barriers between the two cities is "cross-hatched" and weak and it is here that citizens are at risk of unauthorised crossings or breaches, as they are known.

As Borlu and sidekick Corwi investigate, it seems the student has been working on both sides of the border on an archaelogical dig and her theories, along with those of her mentor Professor David Bowden, have also attracted the interest of nationalist and unificationist politicians on the Oversight Committee which governs relations between the cities. As the case becomes increasingly sensitive and complex, Borlu is teamed up with an Ul Qoman detective, Qusim Dhatt, to continue the investigation.

The divide is policed by a force simply known as Breach, which citizens of both cities live in fear of since those who make unauthorized crossings have a tendency to disappear.

The student, Mahalia Geary, and Bowden have posited a theory that Breach is part of a third city, Orciny, often dismissed as a myth. But is there something to their ideas, and is Mahalia's death and the disappearance of fellow student Yolanda Rodriguez connected to it? To solve the murder, might Borlu have to put himself at the mercy of Breach?

Mieville skillfully combines the tropes of a police procedural novel with his extraordinary, surreal creation. Unlike the cliched sword and sorcery fantasy writers who invoke the rural and the medieval in their worlds, Mielville's work is fiercely urban both here and in his other novels making him, to my mind, a much more interesting writer than George R.R. Martin and his ilk.

There is more to Mieville's creation, however, than simply fantastical story telling. The author is a committed socialist and often uses his fiction to make political points. Here, the message is about how easy we find it to ignore the ills of our societies in the same way as the two cities are trained to ignore one another.

This is certainly a fantastic novel in one sense of the word, and its sheer inventiveness and the force of its central conceit are undeniable and I was drawn into this richly imagined world. I guess how much you like this novel (and I liked it very much) will depend on how much you can buy into it.

The City and the City did have some flaws to my mind. Borlu is not a reflective man and we get little insight into how the denizens of the two cities feel about the strange arrangement in which they live; more might have been interesting although perhaps would not have moved the story along. The thriller elements could perhaps be tighter too. These are quibbles really, though. This is a good novel but I liked the two others of his I've read Perdido Street Station and his criminally underrated debut King Rat more.

Mieville belongs to a distinguished tradition; Wells, Peake, Dick, Kafka, Orwell, Atwood, Borges and Ballard are obvious influences and I believe he is worthy of mention in the same breath. If there was more sci-fi/fantasy writing like this around then perhaps the genre would not be so maligned.

4/5

brightphoebus
7th October 2011, 04:59 PM
I gave this to my novel-averse son in the hopes it would fire him up.Time to wrest it back.

lunababymoonchild
7th October 2011, 06:01 PM
I'm reading this at the moment so have not read your review but will once I'm finished.

lunababymoonchild
19th October 2011, 10:27 AM
Finished this last night and thoroughly enjoyed it.

I agree with Grammath's excellent review except I don't think that Mieville is a good enough writer to be mentioned in the same breath as H G Wells, imho his prose just isn't as elegant. I have only read one of Atwood's, and never having read any of the other authors Gram mentions I can't comment. It is, however, an extraordinary book, the prose is very good indeed and I'd like to read more of the same, in the way of originality.

I thought that the plot was very clever. I was drawn right into the middle of it and had no trouble at all accepting what the author described in the way of living conditions and police procedure. I was also very much interested to find out what happened next. I very much liked the references to how the book got it's name, very clever, very clever indeed.

The one quibble that I have with the book was with the profuse use of the f-word. I don't think that it was necessary and I think that the author could have kept it in but written it as I have above and left the reader to make up their own mind as to whether or not they wanted to read it - perhaps I'm getting prudish in my old age! - it wasn't expected and it didn't stop me reading nor did it stop me enjoying the novel immensely, but I could have done without it.

All in all a great book, well worth reading, I'll certainly read more of China Mielville and much thanks to Gram for bringing this to my attention.

Very recommended.

Grammath
20th October 2011, 02:01 PM
Glad you liked it, luna. I haven't read Wells for a very long time so I'll admit I'd have a hard time comparing their prose styles.

As regards the f-word, this is not the place to debate its use, but I will say I think it mostly comes from the mouth of one characater (Datt) and I believe its use is to highlight what sort of person he is: a cynical, gritty cop. Its a feature of modern hardboiled crime writing (don't ever go near a James Ellroy novel if you don't like it!) so I just accept its presence in this genre which strives towards realistically reflecting street slang.

lunababymoonchild
20th October 2011, 03:04 PM
Glad you liked it, luna. I haven't read Wells for a very long time so I'll admit I'd have a hard time comparing their prose styles.

As regards the f-word, this is not the place to debate its use, but I will say I think it mostly comes from the mouth of one characater (Datt) and I believe its use is to highlight what sort of person he is: a cynical, gritty cop. Its a feature of modern hardboiled crime writing (don't ever go near a James Ellroy novel if you don't like it!) so I just accept its presence in this genre which strives towards realistically reflecting street slang.Oh I really did like it, Gram and I will be seeking out other books by Mielville.

The f-word was just a small quibble in an otherwise excellent book and probably me just being picky.